Friday, December 08, 2006

If I Could Speak to President Bush

... I would share the following words of wisdom.
"A man should never be ashamed to own that he has been in the
wrong, which is but saying that he is wiser today than he was
yesterday."
-- Alexander Pope (1688-1744) English Poet
"The sages do not consider that making no mistakes is a blessing.
They believe, rather, that the great virtue of man lies in his
ability to correct his mistakes and continually make a new man
of himself."
-- Wang Yang-Ming
"When solving problem, dig at the roots instead of just hacking
at the leaves." --
Anthony J. D'Angelo
"No people to whom liberty is given, can hold it as firmly and wear
it as grandly as those who wrench their liberty from the iron fist of
the tyrant." -- Frederick Douglass
"Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme
excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's
resistance without fighting." -- Sun Tzu
"Tact is the knack of making a point without making an enemy."
-- Howard W. Newton
"Power is the ability to do good things for others."
-- Brooke Astor
"The task of leadership, the first task of concerned people,
is not to condemn or castigate, or deplore: it is to search
out the reason for disillusionment and alienation, the
rationale of protest and dissent." --Robert F. Kennedy
and lastly ..
"Blessed are the peacemakers,
For they shall be called sons of God."
-- Jesus

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

Evidence of Answered Prayers

It's been an amazing past few weeks. I've been busy with family commitments and other projects so I haven't had time to comment on a number of headline stories. But don't think I didn't notice. And what I've noticed is that it seems that prayers are being answered.

Could it be that Walmart's announcement of lower than projected holiday sales indicates that the American consumer is starting to realize the hidden costs behind those " every day low, low prices"?

Or does it indicate that consumers are realizing that spending more money than you have is not required to enjoy the holidays?

Are people starting to realize that there is something fundamentally wrong with an economy that relies on excessive end of year credit card spending which takes most consumers a year to pay off?





Could it be that the FOX network has a little integrity?

Maybe. It's more likely that the public outcry against the proposed OJ travesty was not in their financial interest.

Once again, the public flexed its muscle. KUDOs to us









.
And now, an official bi-partisan study group has stated what most of us have known for some time. The Bush administration's policy in Iraq specifically, and in the Middle East in general, is a failure. Maybe now "The Decider" will listen to reason and Barney and Laura will not have to run away from home.

All evidence of answered prayers.

plk
Posted by Picasa

Tips for Holiday Shopping

How to avoid getting scammed while shopping online.
 
courtesy of Cyveillance

 

Arlington, VA (PRWeb) December 6, 2006 -- Cyveillance, the leading provider of online risk monitoring and management solutions, offers consumers the most common Internet security exposures during the holiday shopping season and tips on how to avoid them. A survey shows that 47.1 percent of consumers plan to shop online* for the holidays, and those shoppers must find ways to protect themselves against digital threats that attempt to infect their computers, steal their personal information or otherwise defraud them. Cyveillance outlines some prevalent threats and provides tips to consumers on how to protect their computers, data and personal information and avoid becoming victims of online fraud.

 

Risk: Non-secure Web sites. Cyveillance estimates that over 30 percent of e-commerce sites do not properly protect user transactions with Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), which provides secure Internet transactions.

TIP: Ideally, consumers should be familiar with the companies they buy from and ensure that they are visiting reputable Web sites. They should look for “HTTPS” in their browser’s address bar as well as a digital certificate indicating that their personal information will be encrypted during the transaction. By clicking on the certificate, consumers can determine if the identity of the site matches the information on the certificate.

 

Risk: Malware. This is software unknowingly installed on a user’s computer with the intent of stealing personal information or providing remote access to sensitive data.

TIP: Consumers should make sure they have the latest security updates installed on their computers. They should also be extremely cautious when responding to special offers in spam messages or when visiting unknown Web sites. Free content sites and giveaways are commonly used to lure Internet users to dangerous sites that distribute malware. Avoid clicking on links in any unsolicited email.

 

Risk: Typo-piracy. This can happen when a user makes a typographical error when entering a domain name into a Web browser and is diverted to a different site than intended. Over 10 percent of registered domains redirect users to a different site with a different domain name than the one they intended to visit. Typo-piracy is a highly effective way for predators and fraudsters to divert visitors to their malicious sites.

TIP: Be careful when typing the name of a site directly into the address bar of a Web browser. If a site looks questionable, re-enter the domain name to double check that it is the intended site.

 

Risk: Phishing. This is an attempt to fraudulently acquire sensitive or personal information, such as passwords or account numbers, through counterfeit Web sites and emails.

TIP: Consumers should never respond to email solicitations from unfamiliar entities. Understanding the email policies of companies they do business with is crucial. Most reputable companies will never ask for personal information via email. Phishing scams are no longer limited to online banking and eBay users; new attacks use more tempting offers and sophisticated tricks to lure victims. These threats often include special offers on holiday travel, exceptional deals and pricing on consumer goods, paid surveys, lottery winnings and other tactics. If an offer sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

 

Risk: Outdated security software. Purchasing and installing security software does not guarantee protection against security threats. As online risks evolve, out-of-date software can make computers vulnerable.

TIP: Before shopping online, consumers should update their computers with the latest security patches and anti-virus software. These frequent updates offer protection from constantly evolving online threats, and installing the most current versions of security software is a simple form of protection. In addition, many malicious sites may attempt to change a user’s browser settings, such as the homepage or security options, which can lead to unwanted Web sites or malicious content downloads.

 

Risk: Public computers. Computers at public libraries or Internet cafes are used by hundreds of people daily. Not knowing which Web sites previous users visited or whether the computer has been infected with malware can put online shoppers at great risk.

TIP: Using an unfamiliar computer that could be infected with key loggers or other malware puts consumers at risk for credit card fraud or identity theft. In addition to installing anti-virus, spyware, firewall and pop-up blocker software to detect and protect against malicious programs, consumers shopping online should use computers they are familiar with and trust.

 

Risk: Gift cards. The National Retail Foundation recently estimated that as many as 70 percent of gift cards offered on eBay were obtained fraudulently.

TIP: To avoid the possibility of fraud, consumers should purchase gift cards directly from retailers’ Web sites rather than through third parties. This way, they will also have complete access to the retailer’s refunds and other return and safety policies that are not available through third parties.

 

Risk: Convenience versus safety. Using the same username or password repeatedly can put consumers at risk for personal information and identity theft.

TIP: Don’t risk security for convenience. Consumers should make a habit of using different usernames and passwords for sites they visit frequently and keep their login information in a secure place. To eliminate the risk of having personal data in unknown databases, consumers should always decline when a Web site offers to remember credit card or other information for future visits. In addition, one time use credit cards can be used for online transactions to greatly reduce the risk of fraud.

 

“The best defense is a good offense,” said Todd Bransford, vice president of marketing for Cyveillance. “Shoppers need to take the necessary steps to be sure that the convenience of online shopping isn’t costing them their security and privacy in the long run.”

 

ABOUT CYVEILLANCE

Cyveillance provides online risk monitoring and management solutions to Global 2000 organizations. The company comprehensively monitors the Internet using patented technology to deliver early warning of risks to information, infrastructure and individuals. Armed with this actionable intelligence and Cyveillance’s immediate corrective response capability, chief security officers can proactively protect their company’s reputation, revenues and customer trust. Cyveillance counts as clients over half of the Fortune 50 and three-quarters of the top Fortune 500 companies in the financial services, pharmaceutical, energy and technology industries. For more information on how to make your online experience a safe one, please visit www.cyveillance.com.

Friday, December 01, 2006

The Last Word on The War Against Christmas


For the past few years there has been an escalating debate over whether the Christmas holiday is under attack. There've been threats to boycott stores that don't call their decorated fir and spruce tress - "Christmas Trees" and chastisements for people that send out "Season's Greetings" cards. There are those putting forth the idea that there is some sort of organized campaign by political liberals, atheists and non-Christian religions to take the "Christ" out of Christmas.


Well, let's end the debate. Christmas has been under attack since the day the holy day's namesake was born. It has not been an attack by political liberals or other religions but an attack by those that can not accept The Spirit and its message. It is a war waged by the egos of those who refuse to recognize that the only true authority comes from the Kingdom of Heaven.

So if you view this season, as simply a time to get and give gifts, go to parties, put up decorations and eat lots of food then it doesn't really matter what you call the holiday, does it? But if, you view this season as a time to share love with those around you, give hope to those that are losing their's, bring joy to those in sorrow, share food with those who may be hungry, give help to those that are struggling, promote peace on earth and, believe in miracles then the Spirit of Christ is in your heart and for you this is Christmas.

So this month please join me on PointOfView316 and it's companion blog Pause For Thought in celebrating the holidays of Christmas, Hanukkah and Kwanza. I hope that the messages, music, and artwork on the website and blog will touch your heart and help share the reason and meaning of the season.

Pamela Lyn

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

The Truth Behind 9/11 Loans

If you thought that the stories of the misappropriation of funds from the Gulf Coast Rebuilding Fund were unbelievable, just read this. The public needs to demand a full investigation into this fraud and criminal charges need to be filed. plk
kyw.com - I-Team: Truth Behind 9/11 Loans
http://cbs3.com/topstories/local_story_333215932.html

Summary:
Jim Osman Reporting (CBS 3) PHILADELPHIA -- After the September 11th terrorist attacks, our government handed out millions of dollars to help rebuild New York City.
So what the CBS 3 I-Team exposed may be both shocking and disturbing.

Why would Delaware and Lehigh Valley bowling alleys, liquor stores, and even tanning salons get a cut of that money?

Businesses near ground zero went under though the government promised to help them rebuild and offered a targeted program of low-interest loans.

The intent of the government loan program was to help rehabilitate businesses directly impacted by 9/11 like businesses near ground zero. The reality, the program was a bureaucratic nightmare and the outrage is the Delaware Valley connection and how the money was really spent.

Like the $660-thousand dollar loan the government gave to Voorhees Discount Liquors in South Jersey.

Or the One-million 30-thousand dollar loan given to Gold's Gym in Thorndale, Chester County.

Or the One million 56-thousand dollar loan given to Rocky's Cocktail Lounge and Pub in Burlington County.

A tanning salon in South Jersey got a loan and so did a bowling alley in the Lehigh Valley.

But a restaurant, when it tried to apply for the same post-September 11th rebuilding loans - couldn't get a dime. A slap in the face because the restaurant - Steamer's Landing - is one block away from ground zero.

The answer, each of the Philadelphia area businesses we spoke with, say they had no clue their loans were coming from a fund dedicated solely to rebuilding after September 11th.

The manager at the Ramada Inn in Gibbstown, South Jersey told us off camera that he didn't know the hotel got a two million dollar loan from that 9/11 fund.

All told Delaware Valley businesses got 123 loans totaling 68-million dollars compared to NYC businesses that got just 16 loans totaling million 8 dollars.

Ralph Maerz is disappointed the government didn't do a better job overseeing the loan program. His son Noel died on September 11th but he says you don't have to be a parent of a 9/11 victim to be outraged about what we're exposing.

The banks say it's the government's fault for a lack of oversight.

Will You Be A Player or A Designer?

Will you be an individual that camps out over night in a mall parking lot to be the first in line to purchase the latest Playstation OR will you be an individual that designs the gaming technology and reaps the profits?

In case you missed it, last night's broadcast of Lou Dobbs tonight featured a segment that discussed a recent survey of 400 employers that states that America's high school and college graduates just aren't making the grade. It has been recognized for some time that there are serious problems with the US educational system. However, if this report doesn't drive the point home I suspect that nothing will.

According to reporter Kitty Pilgrim, "Even essential job skills, old-fashioned get up and go needed improvement -- leadership, professionalism, social responsibility, teamwork, oral communication and problem solving. "

Based on this news, if the quality of education does not improve soon, our future graduates won't be sleeping in parking lots to purchase Playstations they'll be sleeping in parking lots to fill out the job applications to sell them

plk


Excerpt from
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Aired November 28, 2006 - 18:00 ET

Read the entire transcript at
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0611/28/ldt.01.html


Many high school and college graduates are sorely lacking in the skills that they need to hold their first jobs. That's the conclusion of a new report compiled by major employer groups. The study is called, quote, "are they really ready to work?" Kitty Pilgrim has the answer.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

KITTY PILGRIM, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): The new kids in the office lack basic academic skills and also life skills, such as teamwork and leadership.

LINDA BARRINGTON, THE CORPORATE BOARD: It was more negative than we expected. Even among college graduates, over a quarter of employers said they saw deficiency in written communications with new entrants who had a four-year college degree.

PILGRIM: This was no academic exercise. This survey was conducted by real-life employers about real-life employees in the workforce today. Four hundred employers found many of their first- time workers lacked 20 of the essential skills to job success.

Basic education levels scored poorly. Seventy-two percent of employers said high school graduates were deficient in writing in English. Fifty-three percent of employers said high school graduates were deficient in mathematics.

College graduates didn't do much better. The e-mail generation can't write, spell or communicate.

Half of employers found two-year college graduates lacking basic skills -- grammar, spelling, written communication.

In terms of competitiveness, it's a disaster.

DONNA KLEIN, CORPORATE VOICES: If we want to maintain our economic superiority in terms of the private sector, we're dependent on a very well-skilled entry level workforce. And this study really indicates that we're really not where we need to be for the future.

PILGRIM: Even essential job skills, old-fashioned get up and go needed improvement -- leadership, professionalism, social responsibility, teamwork, oral communication and problem solving.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

PILGRIM: Knowledge in foreign languages will increase in importance in the next five years, more than any other basic skill, that's according to 60 percent of the companies. And three quarters of the CEOs reported having difficulty finding qualified workers. They say it's a very big problem and very important to global competitiveness -- Lou.

DOBBS: You know, I'm torn on that kind of a report. Who are these corporations that are having so much trouble?

PILGRIM: There's 400 corporations, they are mid-range corporations...

DOBBS: Big old corporations?

PILGRIM: They are mid-range corporations, and they couldn't find the right skills.

DOBBS: They couldn't find those skills. You know, I always suspect, by the way, when I hear people talking as those people you interviewed, frankly I found them not so communicative myself and I think they could use a little rehabilitation.

But secondly, what happened in the last six years? Suddenly Americans are so stupid? I don't believe that for a minute. I know we've got huge problems in education, but what in the heck is wrong with these companies? And I really suspect their motives for these kinds of studies -- it sounds like they're trying to lay the foundation for more H2B visas. They're trying to lay a foundation for an agenda altogether separate -- let's go back to those 400 companies and find out how much they're investing in their local communities, in public education and trying to do something about the very problems they're talking about. Can we do that?

PILGRIM: Absolutely.

DOBBS: Let's carry on this story just a little further.

Thank you, Kitty.

Allies Not Waiting for New Strategy to Announce Iraq Withdrawals

by Jim Mannion
 
Published on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 by the Agence France Presse
 
Summary:
A debate over whether to set a timetable for a phased withdrawal of US forces from Iraq is being preempted by key US allies who have announced plans to scale back their own forces over the next year, analysts say.

The latest and most important to announce was Britain, whose defense minister said Monday the 7,100-member British contingent will be scaled back "by a matter of thousands" by the end of next year.

Poland, which commands a 2,000-strong multi-national division in southern Iraq, said Monday that its 880-man contingent will be out of Iraq by late 2007.

Italy, once a mainstay of the coalition force with 3,000 troops in Iraq, has withdrawn all but 60 to 70 troops from the country and those will be gone by early December, said Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi.

"Even if the United States has decided to stay its course, they don't want any part of that," he said.

"The United Kingdom is a great ally in the war on terrorism and we appreciate its contributions in the war on Iraq," said Lieutenant Colonel Mark Ballesteros, a Pentagon spokesman.

The British announcement appeared likely to throw fuel on the US debate over how to turn responsibility for security over to Iraqis -- and draw down US forces -- without precipitating an outright collapse of the Iraqi government or full-blown civil war.

 

 

The Peace Movement Reborn

 
Reaction to Wreath Edict Leads to More Peace Symbols - New York Times
Published: November 29, 2006
Summary:
DENVER, Nov. 28 --- Peace is fighting back in Pagosa Springs.

Last week, a couple were threatened with fines of $25 a day by their homeowners' association unless they removed a four-foot wreath shaped like a peace symbol from the front of their house.

Two board members have disconnected their telephones, apparently to escape the waves of callers asking what the board could have been thinking, residents said.

The third board member, with a working phone, did not return a call for comment.

A board member later told a newspaper that he thought the familiar circle with angled lines was also, perhaps, a sign of the devil.

The peace symbol came to prominence in the late 1950s as the logo for the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, a British antiwar group, according to the group's Web site.

Other people have said the upright line with arms angled down, commonplace in the United States in the Vietnam War, especially, has roots in the early Christian era, representing a twisted or broken cross.

In any case, there are now more peace symbols in Pagosa Springs, a town of 1,700 people 200 miles southwest of Denver, than probably ever in its history.

A former president of the Loma Linda community, where Mr. Trimarco lives, said Tuesday that he had stepped in to help form an interim homeowners' association.

Town Manager Mark Garcia said Pagosa Springs was building its own peace wreath, too. Mr. Garcia said it would be finished by late Tuesday and installed on a bell tower in the center of town.



Summarized by Copernic Summarizer

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

 

Group Wants 'Global Orgasm For Peace'

POSTED: 7:53 am EST November 20, 2006

 

Two peace activists have planned a massive anti-war demonstration for the first day of winter.

But they don't want you marching in the streets. They'd much rather you just stay home.

The Global Orgasm for Peace was conceived by Donna Sheehan, 76, and Paul Reffell, 55, whose immodest goal is for everyone in the world to have an orgasm Dec. 22 while focusing on world peace.

"The orgasm gives out an incredible feeling of peace during it and after it," Reffell said Sunday. "Your mind is like a blank. It's like a meditative state. And mass meditations have been shown to make a change."

The couple are no strangers to sex and social activism. Sheehan, no relation to anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan, brought together nearly 50 women in 2002 who stripped naked and spelled out the word "Peace."

The stunt spawned a mini-movement called Baring Witness that led to similar unclothed demonstrations worldwide.

The couple have studied evolutionary psychology and believe that war is mainly an outgrowth of men trying to impress potential mates, a case of "my missile is bigger than your missile," as Reffell put it.

By promoting what they hope to be a synchronized global orgasm, they hope to get people to channel their sexual energy into something more positive.

The couple said interest appears strong, with 26,000 hits a day to their Web site, www.globalorgasm.org.

"The dream is to have everyone in the world (take part)," Reffell said. "And if that means laying down your gun for a few minutes, then hey, all the better."

Monday, November 27, 2006

Subcontracting Democracy?

 
What an interpreting question to ponder.  
 
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language defines democracy as follows:
 
"1. Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives. 2. A political or social unit that has such a government. 3. The common people, considered as the primary source of political power. 4. Majority rule. 5. The principles of social equality and respect for the individual within a community"
 

By this definition, our claim to democracy is being challenged.  It is clear that the majority party of the 109th Congress was owned by "K" Street,  that politicians now spend more time campaigning and raising money than they do representing their constituency, that presidents are elected by an outdated electoral college process rather than the vote of the majority,  that the initial response to hurricane Katrina put a spotlight on social inequality and, respect for the individual has been temporarily suspended by the "patriot" act.   So in light of these problems, subcontracting may not be democracy's greatest threat.

At the heart of Elephant's question is the issue of the degree to which decisions made in war are impacted by who is profiting from that war vs. actual military strategy? 

I recall my disillusionment at discovering in high school, during a discussion of the Viet Nam war,  that the stock market and economists view war as "good for the economy".   My teacher was making the point that Viet Nam represented a new era in warfare. An era in which the spoils of war are not gained after victory but gained during the conflict by supplying the tools of war.   This concept of legalized war profiteering which seemed covert during the Viet Nam war is glaringly obvious during the current Iraq war.  Just ask Bunnatine ( Bunny ) Greenhouse, former Army Corps of Engineers chief contracting officer who blew the whistle on Halliburton and then was demoted for "poor job performance. 

So can a country that sees people like Bunny Greenhouse be punished for their honesty, accepts run away campaign spending, turned a blind eye to unbridled corporate influence in government and seems to be subcontracting democracy still claim to be one.  I hope so. 
 
After all, democracy is still an experiment, a process that we are still learning.  And hopefully we are learning from our mistakes.   The recent mid-term elections seem to indicate that the American public still cares about making their govenrment work. 
 
Pamela Lyn

Friday, November 24, 2006

Turning Communities Into Toxic Waste Dumps For A Price

You probably won't hear about this on either your local or national news broadcast. After all, it happened in the Ivory Coast and the local officials were at fault, right?

Even if you don't read this entire article think about this. If corporations run out of corrupt Third World officials that are willing to sacrifice the lives of their citizens, how much will it cost for your neighborhood to be turned into a toxic waste dump?

As the article points out the waste management company "Tommy", "was created during the same period when the Probo Koala left Holland for the Ivory Coast," and that it had "had all appearances of a shell company created for the circumstance."

And you thought this only happened in the movies!

plk


Ivory Coast officials blamed for lethal toxic slick

Read the entire article at http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/23/news/ivory.php

Summary:
Mismanagement, negligence and fraud by government agencies and private companies led to the dumping of a highly toxic cocktail of petrochemical waste in Ivory Coast in August, according to a government report issued there Thursday.

At least 10 people died and thousands were sickened after chemical waste pumped from a tanker chartered by a Netherlands-based oil trading company was dumped across Abidjan, the capital of Ivory Coast, in the main landfill and near poor residential neighborhoods.

Citing the "lack of rigorous management, failure to observe professional ethics and nonapplication of regulations," the report concluded that officials at the city's port and in several government ministries responsible for monitoring the shipping and handling of waste and petroleum allowed the chain of events that led to the dumping, despite repeated red flags.

The waste arrived in Abidjan on Aug. 19 aboard the Probo Koala, a Greek- owned tanker flying a Panamanian flag and leased by Trafigura, an oil trading corporation.

The tanker carried a toxic mix of chemicals that the ship had already tried to dispose of in Amsterdam in July, saying the waste was ordinary slop from cleaning the tanks of petroleum products.

But workers in Amsterdam's port refused to take the waste for the initial price, $15,000, saying it was toxic and would require special disposal.

Instead of paying the more than $300,000 it would cost to dispose of the waste in Europe, the ship sailed a circuitous route that included stops in Estonia and Nigeria, eventually arriving in Abidjan, where a subsidiary of Trafigura, Puma Energie, arranged to have the waste disposed of by Tommy, a local company.

The report identified Tommy, which agreed to dispose of the waste for $20,000, and its manager, Salomon Ugborugbo, as mainly responsible for the dumping.

Before the waste arrived, Ugborugbo wrote an electronic message to a Trafigura official, saying that he had found a place "outside the city called 'Akwedo' where he would dump the products," the report said.

Akouedo is the city landfill surrounded by poor neighborhoods and frequented by thousands of people who make a living picking recyclable items from the trash.

Once the waste arrived, Tommy hired 12 tanker trucks, paying them about $250 each, and sent them to dump the material in Akouedo, according to the report.

Summarized by Copernic Summarizer

Thursday, November 23, 2006

Happy Thanksgiving

Today may not be a holiday in your country but it is my deepest wish that you and those you love be blessed today and throughout the year.

May we all one day celebrate together in a world where the harvest is shared with all.


Pamela Lyn
 Posted by Picasa